jeff cook zero point gravity
 
 
jeff cook effectzero point gravity physicsjeff cook mathematicsjeff cook synthetic lifejeff cook musicjeff cook woe huntedjeff cook philosophy
 
 

jeff cook homepage
jeff cook physics introjeff cook physics 101jeff cook NET

Cook's New Electrogravity Theory

The NET 04

With the required parameters listed earlier, some may have wondered why charge wasn't included with them. It's because it has been modified. In fact, almost all SI units are modified for the NET, adding greater depth of their meaning.

For example:

electron charge

Where n is the Quantum Number and -1 sets its spin either clockwise or counter-clockwise for each orbital of the atom.

At n = 1:

q = -1.602176... x 10^-19 C

At n = 2:

q = +1.602176... x 10^-19 C

At n = 3:

q = -1.602176... x 10^-19 C

And then the modification of the classic electron radius:

electron radius

Where the -1 maintains that an outside observer views this dimension from the opposite side of an Imaginary plane.

Constant for all n:

e_r = -2,817940... x 10^-15 m

Most modifications are somewhat more tricky, but with specific and definitive meaning. Consider the following:

permeability free space

Where the 4 is negative because it is an Integer (remember the rule) and pi maintains its positive calculable polarity as the Irrational number equal to 3.141592....

Constant for all n:

mu_oi = -1.256637...i x 10^-06 H m^-1

But the Imaginary value in the product is somewhat less clear. With the NET, the Imaginary value in (3) actually equals the value of the Polar Magnetic Force of the electron, as will be shown, and just so happens to be Imaginary. Thus, if one considers the Imaginary value above as a value with dimensions, the rest actually is straightforward considering the prior definitions.

As more is presented in time, all this will become considerably easier to understand--for what has been presented so far is quite a peculiar stretch from standard physics (don't worry, no laws are broken). It's just different. But as one will soon begin to learn this stuff, such modifications do add greater clarity to a large number of physical problems and allow for greater solutions to be made in physics as will be shown.

Let's continue.

Where c is the Velocity of Light in a Vacuum, ci is its Imaginary and mu_oi is the Imaginary Permeability of Free Space from (3).

Constant for all n:

epsilon_o = 8.854187... x 10^-12 s^2 H^-1 m^-1

Perhaps now we can more forward in order to better reveal these NET rules with some standard Quantum Physics.

bohr radius hydrogen

Where -n is the Quantum Number for the proton and +n for the electron, -h is Plancks's Constant for the proton and +h for the electron, epsilon_o is the Permittivity of Free Space, -q is the Electron Charge, +q is the Proton Charge, m_e is the Electron Mass and pi is the Irrational number with the value of 3.141592....

At n = 1

B_r = -5.291772... x 10^-11 m

At n = 2

B_r = -2.116708... x 10^-10 m

At n = 3

B_r = -4.762594... x 10^-10 m

So one can now begin to see in (5) the meaning of the -'s and +'s, as they generally refer to a physical aspect (such as either the electron or the proton) within the equation that may not otherwise be recognizable.

Let's expand upon this.

orbit group velocity hydrogen

Where -n is the Quantum Number for the proton and +n for the electron, -h is Plancks's Constant for the proton and +h for the electron, the Integer 2 is negative, pi is the Irrational number with the value of 3.141592..., B_r is the Bohr radius from (5), m_e is the Electron Mass and epsilon_o is the Permittivity of Free Space from (4).

At n = 1

V_g = 2.187940... x 10^6 m s^-1

At n = 2

V_g = 1.093845... x 10^6 m s^-1

At n = 3

V_g = 7.292304... x 10^5 m s^-1

Now we can begin to bring such Quantum aspects more into the realm of Relativity.

lorentz factor

Where we have an example of two exceptions that were defined earlier, as they are the square root of the values (a positive Integer and a negative Velocity), -V_g is the Proton Orbit Velocity (yes, the proton orbits inside the electron radius in the atom in accordance with the NET), the negative counterpart to +V_g, which is the Electron Orbit Velocity, -c is the Speed of Light from the perspective of the proton and +c its perspective from the electron.

At n = 1

Lambda_R = 1.000026... (dimensionless)

At n = 2

Lambda_R = 1.000006... (dimensionless)

At n = 3

Lambda_R = 1.000003... (dimensionless)

Do you know what the Lorentz Factor is? Well briefly, it arises from the physical fact that objects appear to contract from an outside observer's point of view the faster it travels. The factor above allows scientists to account for this in their measurements and was used extensively by Einstein in developing his relativistic model.

With it one can now begin to discuss the significance of equation (x) with an Imaginary Fine Structure Constant in terms of Quantum and Relativity Physics (enter the NET stage right).

imaginary fine structure constant

Where n is the Quantum Number, -Lamda_R is the Lorentz Factor for the perspective of the proton, +Lambda_R (as well as the Lambda_R in the denominator) is for the perspective of the electron, and the +1 is the NET exception that all Integers need to be represented as negatives except the square root of 1, which is the purpose of the redundant +, for clarification, as one could simply write ( -Lamnda_R * +Lambda_R ) + 1 and it would mean the same mathematically.

Constant for all n:

alphai = 7.297352...i x 10^-03 (dimensionless)

This so far should have most readers caught up to the purpose of Cook's modifications applied to standard physics. Not only do they provide the means for one to look at an equation with better meaning, but also they provide a steady path for one to calculate through all other dimensions in systematic order, without contradiction to trace it back to each parameter involved in a precise and individual process.

In short, in terms of the NET, the Fine Structure Constant is always an Imaginary number. Not only is it shown in (9) above in terms of physics, but also because of equation (x) it seems to have more meaning being Imaginary even with pure mathematics than it does being Real. Thus, according to Cook, there is no such thing as a Real Fine Structure Constant; that is, unless one deliberately divides it by i.

So, what else...

 

 

 

 

jeff cook eventsjeff cook links

 
 
Copyright © 2008-2010 JeffreyNCook.com. All rights reserved.