Cook's New Electrogravity Theory

The NET 08

While the last page was long and cumbersome, though absolutely important for what follows, this page is for the large part straightforward and rather short in comparison. It too is absolutely important for what follows. In addition, this page shows the fix of a resonable error in Cook's earlier version of the NET, that which linked Bayles work with Evans. While both their work in how it fits in with the NET is described herein, there was a problem in the prior NET that suggested that Bayles' omega_LM, written as omega_x in the NET, was not constant, which not only goes against Bayles' work, but also practical electrogravitational observation (if that indeed can even be said). The fix herein was only possible with these new implementations to this theory, which is now much more solid and stands more on its own with less explanation.

Let's begin at perhaps the heart of this matter, the Vector Magnetic Potential.

Where phi_ep is the Electrical Potential between the electron and proton from (32 & 33) and V_g is the Electron Orbit (Group Velocity) from (6 & 7).

At n = 1:

A = -1.243840... x 10^-5 W m^-1

At n = 2:

A = +6.219201... x 10^-6 W m^-1

At n = 3:

A = -4.146134... x 10^-6 W m^-1

And then Evan's connections,

Where K is the Magnetic Curl from (37, 38 & 39), B is the Polar Magnetic Force from (49 & 50), A is the Vector Magnetic Potential from (65) above and one is negative in accordance with the NET rules.

At n = 1:

omega = 1.889726... x 10^10 m^-1

At n = 2:

omega = 4.724315... x 10^9 m^-1

At n = 3:

omega = 2.099695... x 10^9 m^-1

And,

Where E_fep is the Electric Field from (34, 35 & 36), A is the Vector Magnetic Potential from (65) above, c is the Speed of Light, which is negative in terms of Scalar Energies in accordance with the NET, and one is negative in accordance with the NET rules.

At n = 1:

omega_o = 1.378999... x 10^8 m

At n = 2:

omega_o = 1.723749... x 10^7 m

At n = 3:

omega_o = 5.107406... x 10^6 m

It should be noted here that this is the only occurance in the NET where Mr. Cook breaks his style-guide in restricting the omega symbol for frequencies; above they are also used for distance and the inverse of distance, but this is only because these are Evans' symbols as defined by him.

Mr. Cook is only interested with the Scalar Spin Connection at this time and for the purposes of these writings. But it is significant in other areas and now is really the only good time to introduce it.

Now for some Imaginary Parameters. The following occur outside the realm of electrical conduction visible to those of us on the Real axis, but are critical in the link between Scalar Energies and Electrical Energies.

Where B_r is the Bohr Radius from (5) and omega_ai is the Imaginary attractive Atomic Frequency from (31).

At n = 1:

V_afi = -1.201199...i x 10^13 m s^-1

At n = 2:

V_afi = -4.804798...i x 10^13 m s^-1

At n = 3:

V_afi = -1.081079...i x 10^14 m s^-1

Where V_afi is the Imaginary Atomic Spin (Phase) Velocity from (68) above, omega_o is the Scalar Spin Connection from (67) above and the positive 1 meter shows the ratio between these two velocities at the same arbitrary distance on the Real axis from which it does not directly receive or pass information.

At n = 1:

V_agi = -8.710657...i x 10^4 m s^-1

At n = 2:

V_agi = -2.787410...i x 10^6 m s^-1

At n = 3:

V_agi = -2.116689...i x 10^7 m s^-1

Where V_agi is the Imaginary Atomic Orbit (Group) Velocity from (69) above and lambda_es is the Electron Spin Wavelength from (21).

At n = 1:

omega_ari = -4.919707...i x 10^18 Hz

At n = 2:

omega_ari = -1.574306...i x 10^20 Hz

At n = 3:

omega_ari = -1.195488...i x 10^21 Hz

Where -h is Planck's Constant for the proton, which aids in the explanation that such energy is well under the electron energy bands, more at the nuclear level, and omega_ari is the Imaginary Repulsive Atomic Frequency from (70) above.

At n = 1:

E_ari = 3.259832...i x 10^-15 J

At n = 2:

E_ari = 1.043146...i x 10^-13 J

At n = 3:

E_ari = 7.921392...i x 10^-13 J

And its associated force:

Where E_ari is the Imaginary Repulsive Atomic Energy from (71) above and lambda_es is the Electron Spin Wavelength from (21).

At n = 1:

F_ari = 1.841126...i x 10^-1 N

At n = 2:

F_ari = 5.891604...i N

At n = 3:

F_ari = 4.473936...i x 10^1 N

Noting the values above, this matches with common notions that this is by far the strongest force in the Hydrogen atom.

And thus, the following ratio:

Where omega_ai is the Imaginary attractive Atomic Frequency from (31), omega_ari is the Imaginary Repulsive Atomic Frequency from (70) above, E_ai is Hydrogen's Imaginary Atomic Energy from (26), E_ari is the Imaginary Repulsive Atomic Energy from (71) above and the absolute values are required because we restricted the Hydrogen Mass earlier when solving for omega_ai and E_ai from going into the Complex Realm, which would offset the polar style guide of the NET without absolute values.

And this is a Real ratio, as i cancels out from each.

At n = 1:

Gamma_R = 4.613969... x 10^4 (dimensionless)

At n = 2:

Gamma_R = 1.441865... x 10^3 (dimensionless)

At n = 3:

Gamma_R = 1.898752... x 10^2 (dimensionless)

And now one can then see where Bayles' omega_LM, the Electrogravitational Frequency fits into this as a constant frequency...

Where -K is the Magnetic Curl of the electron and +K for the proton from (37, 38 & 39), -alphai is the Imaginary Fine Structure Constant pertaining to the proton, +alphai pertaining to the electron and the positive Real alpha is that pertaining to the free space in the Band Gap (Forbidden Band) separating the two from (9), Alpha_Ri is the Imaginary Alpha Factor from (20), -n is the Quantum Number pertaining to the Proton's bands and +n is that of the electron's, V_g is the electron Orbit (Group) Velocity from (6 & 7), Gamma_R is the Gamma Ratio from (73 & 74) above and omega_LM is Jerry Bayles' defined Electro-gravitational Frequency.

For all n:

omega_xi = 1.003224...i x 10^1 Hz

While there are a lot of variables in the equation above, it really is perhaps the most telling definition of this parameter, as it explains to Mr. Cook that this frequency originates from energy somewhere between the electron and the proton bands within the atom. With the additional Real Fine Structure Constant, it suggests that it comes from the Band Gap itself.

While it is commonly known that there is a Band Gap between each of the electron orbitals of every atom and/or molecule, the equation above is how Mr. Cook views the origin of the force of gravity of an individual atom at the center Forbidden Band separating all the electron bands and all the proton bands. Yes, the NET indeed subscribes to the notion that protons also exist in descreet bands like the electron. Now, in this model, while gravity originates from the forbidden bands between each of the electron bands, as well as between each of the proton bands, the gravity evident to us on the outside is only that from the Real zone between the two, hence the Real Fine Structure Constant. And because most of the gravity at play in the atom exists on the Imaginary axis, gravity appears as a weak force to us, as we can only view that coming from a single band in each atom. In fact, as shown in (76), the Imaginary Numbers cancel anyway, which allows the entire gravitational interaction between the electron and proton's band to be evident to an outside observer. While this above equation really says alot, it is still just the beginning of Cook's NET. When the actual force of gravity and much more is presented, all this will become more obvious.

Let's move on...