Cook's New Electrogravity
Theory
The NET 11 - Virtual Particles
Now that the Mach-Cook Parallel has
been discussed in terms of Cook's New Electrogravity
Theory, one can begin to move on to many
unexplored areas of the atom, particularly
those in the super-luminal realm.
In Cook's earlier interests of electrogravity,
he needed to work from the assumption (the
only assumption in that theory) that a tachyon
existed at play in the mechanics of an electron.
It was an important assumption, however, that
allowed one to solve for the electron spin
energy from an assumed tachyon charge. That
assumption is no longer required.
But first, what are tachyons, virtual
particles? The same thing? Aren't virtual
particles related to Zero Point Energy?
It should be understood that many terms in
science are fixed before phenomenon is properly
understood. This convolutes the issue often
in the future when understanding catches up
and it seems the terms applied to science
don't fully fit with observation. That said,
by definition, a virtual particle are
those mysterious types that pop in or out
of existence in the vacuum of space.
But by definition, one cannot detect virtual
particles, else they cease to be virtual.
However, the forces of their interactions
have been carefully measured by physicists
for years. It is absolutely not fringe science.
It's real, and scientists have a rather decent
understanding of it. What they do not understand
completely (or should I say, "agree on")
is what they are while in their virtual
state. In other words, do they really pop
in and out of the universe, or, as Cook
believes, are their forces only apparent in
our universe when dropping momentarily below
c?
A tachyon is simply any particle (or
object) that travels faster than c.
Many physicists will consider tachyons outside
the realm of mainstream physics, but this
is only because the main theories to date
do not require them. They allow them, but
do not require them. Tachyons actually were
conceived and described by valid scientists.
Problem is, without the Mach-Cook
Parallel, Einstein's assumption
that what starts below c, remains below
c and what starts above c (for
later Relativists), remains above c.
In other words, common thought is that nothing
is transluminal. Thus, if tachyons
are allowed in Relativity to travel
greater than c, which they are, then
they must never be allowed to drop below c.
But the Mach-Cook Parallel suggests
that this is not at all the case at all.
Thus, in accordance with the NET,
virtual particles are simply tachyons.
And yes, if there are an infinite (or even
un-accounted for) number of particles traveling
all around us faster than can be observed,
then yes, there's a lot more energy in the
universe for us to tap than just those in
a lead-acid battery, which indeed measures
up to be that so-called zero point energy.
To begin, I will show how Cook describes
the way to view c if an object is traveling
faster than c. Now remember, for anyone
/ anything travelling greater than c,
c will look the same as it does here
in the subluminal universe. However,
for one to be able to track a superluminal
particle, a virtual particle, it helps
to know how to time for its arrival from our
point of view.
It is based again on the Hydrogen atom:
B_r is the Bohr radius from
(5), V_g
is the Electron Orbit (Group Velocity)
from (6 & 7),
n is the Quantum Number for
the electron, ni for the tachyon, e_r
is the electron radius from (2),
alphai is the Fine Structure Constant
pertaining to the electron from (9
& 96), V_f
is a Real Electron Spin Velocity (Phase
Velocity) / Tachyon Orbit Velocity
from V_fi in (27,
28 & 29) and Zi is the Mach-Cook
Number from (116
& 117).
Constant for all n:
ci^% = -5.629762...i x 10^12 m s^-1
In short, the speed of light from the
superluminal point of view is simply the phase
velocity divided by the Mach-Cook number.
Note: the division of n maintains this
value to be constant while the tachyon
is present in the makeup of the atom and has
much less meaning for a craft travelling >
c.
In short, the above speed is a simple ratio
larger than the phase velocity, the
same as c is a simple ratio larger
than any velocity we travel here in the land
of sublumination (I think I just made that
word up, "sublumination," but I
like it). It's really that simple; that is,
after dredging through the last page...it's
simple now.
But we will not use the above value until
the next page. On this page, it will first
be shown exactly the importance of a tachyon
being required in the atomic structure in
order to explain the electron's spin energy.
Thus, without this below (the tachyon's
charge), the electron would not spin at
all in accordance with the NET.
If by analogy with the charged electron in
orbit with a charged proton we can use Bohr's
method for that of the tachyon, but first
by dividing out the Quantum Number.
The above involves the square root of an
Imaginary, which gives us a complex number.
We can solve for this Complex value using
standard rules of Complex Arithmetic. I'll
work through the math on this particular equation.
The general rule for the square root of a
Complex Number is:
Sqrt{ c } = 1 / Sqrt{ 2 } * rb
* Sqrt{ Sqrt{ a^2 + b^2 } -
a } + 1 / Sqrt{ 2 } * Sqrt{ Sqrt{ a^2
+ b^2 } + a}
Where r is simply an algorithmic term,
meaning, "if b is negative, then
r = -1, else r = +1." In
the case b = 0, there are other problems to
apply. However, in this case, a = 0
and b is the Real value inside the
square roots above in (122 & 123). But
then again, why ever use this cumbersome equation
if a = 0, as that would just leave
the square root of a Real number and one could
just pull up their standard calculator for
that (a rhetorical question of course)?
In any case, there are other factors to consider
before applying the above equation to the
NET, and those all have to do with
the rule that all Integers in the NET
must be negative. However, because the Sqrt
inside the Sqrt is actually from the Pythagorean
Theorem, and thus pertaining to the Modulus
of the Complex number, the meaning of it is
to return the absolute value, which is why
one is allowed within the rules to leave that
square. Here's how it is done.
First the Real part.
And then the Imaginary part.
Where h is Planck's Constant,
omega_esi is the Electron Spin Frequency
from (30), epsilon_o
is the Permittivity of Free Space from
(4), lambda_es
is the Electron Spin Wavelength from
(21), V_fi
is the Electron Spin Velocity (Phase
Velocity) / Tachyon Orbit Velocity
from in (27, 28 &
29), n is the Quantum Number
pertaining to the electron and all integers
except in reductions are negative in accordance
with the NET rule.
For all n:
q_tc = -7.483763... x 10^-51 - 1.552494...i
x 10^-17 C
However, as Cook loves to do
with the NET, he much rather would
restrict the Complex value of the tachyon
charge to an Imaginary number. This
can be done as follows:
Where h is Planck's
Constant, omega_esi is the Electron
Spin Frequency from (30),
epsilon_o is the Permittivity of
Free Space from (4),
lambda_es is the Electron Spin Wavelength
from (21), V_fi
is the Electron Spin Velocity (Phase
Velocity) / Tachyon Orbit Velocity
from in (27, 28 &
29), n is the Quantum Number
pertaining to the electron and all integers
except in reductions are negative in accordance
with the NET rule.
For all n:
q_ti = 2.195558...i x 10^-17 C
Why does he do this?
So he can solve for a Real electron
spin energy, in order to match up with his
earlier work.
Where hi is the Imaginary
Planck's constant, omega_esi
is the Electron Spin Frequency from
(30), n
is the Quantum Number pertaining to
the electron, -q_ti is the charge
of the tachyon, +q_ti is its
positive counterpart from (128 & 129)
above, the two is negative in accordance with
the rule, epsilon_o is the Permittivity
of Free Space from (4)
and lambda_es is the Electron Spin
Wavelength from (21).
At n = 1:
E_es = -1.537445... x
10^-9 J
At n = 2:
E_es = -3.074890... x
10^-9 J
At n = 3:
E_es = -4.612335... x
10^-9 J
Thus, as shown above, as the
electron travels farther and farther from
the proton, the energy of the spin of the
electron increases. In accordance with the
NET, this is due to the fact that the
electron slows due to charge density
as it nears the proton. This was briefly described
on the last page.
So, where else is the tachyon
required in the atom?
Let's see...
|
